Advertising disclosure

Last reviewed 29 July 2026

One network on this site is linked. AdsCompass appears with clickable buttons in the header, in the hero, inside the comparison table and once in the body text. Every other network on the comparison is named without a link, for the plain reason that no links were supplied by them.

What these links are

They are not affiliate links. No commission is paid to this site when someone clicks them or signs up, and no revenue share exists on deposits or on publisher earnings. The links carry rel="noopener" for browser security and are deliberately not marked rel="sponsored", because that attribute would misdescribe the arrangement.

If that ever changes — if a commission, a placement fee or a revenue share is introduced — this page gets rewritten before the arrangement starts, and the links get the sponsored attribute that Google's guidance requires. Anyone can check whether that has happened by viewing the page source.

Why AdsCompass is first in the table

Because of one checkable fact rather than a commercial arrangement. AdsCompass sets the same $50 floor on both sides of the trade: $50 to fund an advertiser account and $50 to withdraw as a publisher. Nothing else on the shortlist matches that symmetry. Kadam opens lower at $30 on the deposit side but publishes no matching payout figure, so the two cannot be compared past the deposit line.

For someone testing the format for the first time, that symmetry is the whole argument: the cost of a failed test is $50 rather than $100, and the network's traffic calculator can be opened before any money moves. The reasoning is on the comparison page in full, and the criteria used across all eleven networks are set out in the methodology.

Evidence the ranking is not bought

Read what the comparison says about the network it ranks first. Automated optimization at AdsCompass is described as thin next to PropellerAds' CPA Goal and the RichAds bidder, with a note that set-and-forget buyers will feel the friction from their first campaign. Its micro-bidding feature is matched by two competitors, and the page says so instead of implying exclusivity. Its traffic volumes are labelled self-reported alongside everyone else's.

A page written to sell would not print those things. A page ranked on published minimums has no reason to hide them.

What the arrangement does not affect

Deposit and payout figures in the table are taken from each network's own documentation, including the figures that make AdsCompass look worse than a rival on a given row. Competitors get recommended where they fit better. PropellerAds and RichAds go to buyers who want the platform to optimize for them. HilltopAds and RollerAds go to anyone needing weekly payment, PopAds and PopCash to a publisher who needs money out tomorrow. One row of the recommendation table answers “none of them”, for publishers currently earning through Google's ad products.

Advertising on this site

popunder-ads.io runs no display advertising and none of the popunder or popup scripts it writes about. It does measure page views with Google Analytics, which sets two first-party cookies, and it runs no advertising pixels of any kind. The privacy page lists the cookies by name and explains how to opt out.

Networks wanting to be listed or linked should read the methodology first, then get in touch through the contact page. Placement is not for sale; supplying documentation that can be verified is what gets a network into the table.